CLPC Steps Out in Faith to Make Lemonade
Members of Clear Lake Presbyterian Church voted to make lemonade at a
historic congregational meeting on Sunday, March 2.
Since discovery of toxic black mold in the sanctuary and Christian
Education (CE) Building early last year, members have been looking for a way
to make lemonade from lemons.
Heeding Laura Huebel's call to "step out in faith," approximately 200
members present overwhelmingly approved two motions authorizing the session
to retain the architectural firm of Ambrose, McEnany and House to develop
plans for a new CE Building and buildout of the Church Life Center's (CLC)
second floor.
John Swartwout, chairman of the Renovations Task Force, said the design plans,
which would cost about $72,000, would be presented to the congregation in
late spring. The congregation will meet again in July to decide whether to
approve the design and financial plans. Construction would not begin until
after the congregation's final approval.
"Our decision is the demonstration of our commitment to realizing the
larger CLPC vision in the service of God in this community," said Paul
Marshall, a member of both the day school board and the task force. Marshall
said that a well-executed capital campaign could typically raise one and a
half to three times the current operating budget.
The task force estimated it would cost $2.8 million to build a new CE
building and $1.2 million to finish the second floor of the CLC and make
other changes. The buildout of the CLC would add 4,400 square feet.
Other changes proposed include the addition of parking spaces and
renovation of the asphalt portion of the parking lot, a covered drop-off
area at the sanctuary, a drop-off area on the Bowsprit side of the CLC and a
bell tower that would distinguish the church from nearby office buildings,
Swartwout said. The $1.2 million would also pay for expenses not covered by
insurance to complete renovation of the sanctuary.
Before approving the two motions at the nearly two-hour meeting, members
turned down a motion proposed originally as an amendment by Don Metzler.
Metzler argued that the decision to hire the architectural firm should be
postponed until after the capital campaign, scheduled for this spring, had
secured commitments for $4 million.
Associate pastor Craig Goodwin served as moderator of the meeting, because
senior pastor Jack Haberer was in Dallas honoring a preaching commitment made long
before the meeting was called. Goodwin said Metzler's amendment would
effectively void the first motion on the agenda and would have to be voted
on as a separate motion.
In response to questions about how the delay proposed by Metzler would
affect plans, Cliff Cunningham, project manager for Project Hallelujah,
noted that the hope was for the day school to open in the new building for
the school year 2004-2005, and that would not be possible if no designs were
drawn until this summer. Marshall said that if the original motion passed,
demolition of the CE building could take place this summer, when day school
students were on vacation.
Huebel urged the congregation to vote for the task force's motions by
saying, "God is pushing us to step out in faith." She quoted a favorite
song, which asks, "Will those who come behind us find us faithful?"
Both Nancy Belknap and Jake Mireles reminded the congregation of the
number of potential church members who first come through the door as
participants in programs that, in the past, took place in the CE Building.
"The water is free, but the bucket costs money. We need a better bucket,"
said Mireles.
During presentation of the motions, Swartwout reviewed the task force's
conclusions that remediating the mold problem and remodeling the CE Building
would not be cost efficient and that the final product would be inadequate.
Swartwout said a renovated CE building would still not have enough space
for CLPC's programs or offices. To obtain code compliance, the church would
have to install an elevator and second stairway and would have to spend
thousands of dollars to make the restrooms compliant with the Americans with
Disabilities Act.
Task force members worried that once remediation began, workers might find
inside the walls more structural damage, which would not be covered by
insurance. The end result, said Swartwout, would be a 35-year-old building
with a life expectancy of 15 years.
At the meeting, Mike Ray reinforced the notion that more damage
would be found inside the walls. As early as two decades ago, Ray and fellow
members removed smelly, rotting wood from the building. "When I saw these
plans, I got excited for the first time," he said, since discovery of the
mold problem.
Written by Vicki M. Cherewaty
Return to New CE Building Page
|